Data valuation techniques quantify each training example's contribution to model performance, providing a principled basis for data cleaning, acquisition, and selection. Existing valuation methods remain inadequate: model-based techniques depend on a single fitted model and inherit its biases, while algorithm-based approaches like Data Shapley scale poorly due to their need to train multiple models. Recent work has proposed model-agnostic alternatives based on Wasserstein distance between the training set and a clean reference set, but exact computation is expensive and approximations often misrank examples. We introduce KAIROS, a model-agnostic framework that values examples by their contribution to the Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) between the training set and a clean reference distribution. Unlike Wasserstein methods, MMD admits a closed-form solution that requires no approximations and is scalable to large datasets. Additionally, KAIROS enables efficient online valuation: adding a new batch of m examples requires only O(mN)computation to update all scores, compared to O(N2)in prior work where N is the training set size. Empirical evaluations on noise, mislabeling, and poisoning benchmarks show that KAIROS consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both accuracy and runtime. On ImageNet, KAIROS achieves up to 15 speedup over the fastest baseline while maintaining superior data valuation quality. Our results demonstrate that model-agnostic methods can match or exceed model-based approaches in performance while scaling to large datasets.

Data deviations in electronic health records (EHR) refer to discrepancies between recorded entries and a patient's actual physiological state, indicating a decline in EHR data fidelity. Such deviations can result from pre-analytical variability, documentation errors, or unvalidated data sources. Effectively detecting data deviations is clinically valuable for identifying erroneous records, excluding them from downstream clinical workflows, and informing corrective actions. Despite its importance and practical relevance, this problem remains largely underexplored in existing research. To bridge this gap, we propose a bi-level knowledge distillation approach centered on a task-agnostic formulation of EHR data fidelity as an intrinsic measure of data reliability. Our approach performs layered knowledge distillation in two levels: from a computation-intensive, task-specific data Shapley oracle to a neural oracle for individual tasks, and then to a unified EHR data fidelity predictor. This design enables the integration of task-specific insights into a holistic assessment of a patient's EHR data fidelity from a multi-task perspective. By tracking the outputs of this learned predictor, we detect potential data deviations in EHR data.

Data valuation quantifies the impact of individual data points on model performance, and Shapley values provide a principled approach to this important task due to their desirable axiomatic properties, albeit with high computational complexity. Recent breakthroughs have enabled fast computation of exact Shapley values for unweighted k-nearest neighbor (kNN) classifiers. However, extending this to weighted kNN models has remained a significant open challenge. The state-of-theart methods either require quadratic time complexity or resort to approximation via sampling. In this paper, we show that a conceptually simple but overlooked approach -- data duplication -- can be applied to this problem, yielding a natural variant of weighted kNN-Shapley. However, a straightforward application of the data-duplication idea leads to increased data size and prohibitive computational and memory costs. We develop an efficient algorithm that avoids materializing the duplicated dataset by exploiting the structural properties of weighted kNN models, reducing the complexity to near-linear time in the original data size. Besides, we establish theoretical foundations for this approach through axiomatic characterization of the resulting values, and empirically validate the effectiveness and efficiency of our method.

Data Shapley values provide a principled approach for quantifying the contribution of individual training examples to machine learning models. However, computing these values often requires computational complexity that is exponential in the data size, and this has led researchers to pursue efficient algorithms tailored to specific machine learning models. Building on the prior success of the Shapley valuation for K-nearest neighbor (KNN) models, in this paper, we introduce a localized data Shapley framework that significantly accelerates the valuation of data points.

Influence functions provide crucial insights into model training, but existing methods suffer from large computational costs and limited generalization. Particularly, recent works have proposed various metrics and algorithms to calculate the influence of data using language models, which do not scale well with large models and datasets. This is because of the expensive forward and backward passes required for computation, substantial memory requirements to store large models, and poor generalization of influence estimates to new data. In this paper, we explore the use of small neural networks - which we refer to as the InfluenceNetwork - to estimate influence values, achieving up to 99% cost reduction. Our evaluation demonstrates that influence values can be estimated with models just 0.0007% the size of full language models (we average across 1.5B-22B versions). We apply our algorithm of estimating influence values (called NN-CIFT: Neural Networks for effiCient Instruction Fine-Tuning) to the downstream task of subset selection for general instruction fine-tuning. In our study, we include four state-of-the-art influence functions and show no compromise in performance, despite large speedups, between NN-CIFT and the original influence functions. We provide an in-depth hyperparameter analyses of NN-CIFT.

In collaborative data sharing and machine learning, multiple parties aggregate their data resources to train a machine learning model with better model performance. However, as the parties incur data collection costs, they are only willing to do so when guaranteed incentives, such as fairness and individual rationality. Existing frameworks assume that all parties join the collaboration simultaneously, which does not hold in many real-world scenarios. Due to the long processing time for data cleaning, difficulty in overcoming legal barriers, or unawareness, the parties may join the collaboration at different times. In this work, we propose the following perspective: As a party who joins earlier incurs higher risk and encourages the contribution from other wait-and-see parties, that party should receive a reward of higher value for sharing data earlier. To this end, we propose a fair and time-aware data sharing framework, including novel time-aware incentives. We develop new methods for deciding reward values to satisfy these incentives. We further illustrate how to generate model rewards that realize the reward values and empirically demonstrate the properties of our methods on synthetic and real-world datasets.

Data valuation has emerged as a powerful framework for quantifying each datum's